Hi, i

Hi, i

Prospects on the grey market are never good. Suggest asking your question instead on the DD Support board as they have many there that can probably answer your question: http://investorshub.advfn.com/DD-Support-Board-and-Fraud-Research-Team-19670/

Hi, I never traded a stock on the Grey's before and with the SEC suspension one of my stocks is going to trade on the Grey's. Since this stock also trades there I was wondering if you, or someone else could give me some answers about this market, and more specific about trading.

Is it true that trades go thru ad random?
Lets say someone puts a bid in for 100k shares at 0.50, and someone else want to sell a 1000 shares at 0.001, is this possible, or do orders get handled from the highest bid, and if there is a lot of bid whacking then they might get to those 1000 shares sell order?

JT Cloud Obituary: http://www.llanocj.com/news_article.php?category_id=4&article_id=3100

Why did this thing jump 9900%? Did it reverse split, letter drop? I couldn't find any changes, news etc related to this company.

The SEC is incompetent beyond words.

It's a miracle that the SEC is doing something, considering how long they let Bernie Madoff rip people off.

Man.. it's about time. I filed a complaint with the SEC when I started posting here almost 2 years ago proving it was a scam. Oh well, better late than never.

Got them again/

Off to the greys she goes.

GAEC suspended by the SEC:

Jul 31, 2009
Pink OTC Markets News Service

Washington, D.C.— SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
RELEASE NO. 60410 / July 31, 2009

SEC SUSPENDS TRADING IN THE SECURITIES OF GULF ALTERNATIVE ENERGY CORPORATION

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission today announced the temporary suspension, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), of trading in the securities of Gulf Alternative Energy Corporation, at 9:30 a.m. EDT, July 31, 2009, through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on August 13, 2009.

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in these securities because of questions regarding the accuracy of statements made by Gulf Alternative Energy Corporation in press releases to investors and on its website concerning the quality of the company’s technology and the company’s business prospects and agreements.

The Commission cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders, and prospective purchasers that they should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available information and any information subsequently issued by the company.

Further, brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Rule 15c2-11 under the Exchange Act, at the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered unless and until they have strictly complied with all of the provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer has any questions as to whether or not it has complied with the rule, it should not enter any quotation but immediately contact the staff in the Division of Trading and Markets, Office of Interpretation and Guidance, at (202) 5515760. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is required by Rule 15c2-11, it should refrain from entering quotations relating to the securities of Gulf Alternative Energy Corporation until such time as it has familiarized itself with the rule and is certain that all of its provisions have been met. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in violation of the rule, the Commission will consider prompt enforcement action.

If any broker, dealer, or other person has any information which may relate to this matter, they should contact Christopher Ehrman, Branch Chief, at (202) 551-4590, or by email at ehrmanc@sec.gov.

Pinksheets has just downgraded GAEC to their dreaded "Caveat Emptor" rating:

http://www.pinksheets.com/pink/quote/quote.jsp?symbol=gaec

Pink OTC Markets has discontinued the display of quotes on pinksheets.com for this security because it has been labeled Caveat Emptor (Buyer Beware) and because adequate current information has not been made available by the issuer of the securities. It has been labeled Caveat Emptor for one of the following reasons:

•Questionable Promotion — The security is being promoted to the public, but adequate current information about the issuer has not been made available to the public.
•Spam — The security is the subject of spam promotion having the effect of encouraging trading of the issuer's securities.
•Investigation of Fraud — There is a known investigation of fraudulent activity involving the company, its securities or insiders.
•Suspension/Halt — A Regulatory Authority has halted or suspended trading for public interest concerns (i.e. not a news or earning halt).
•Disruptive Corporate Actions — The security or issuer is the subject of corporate actions, such as reverse mergers or serial stocks splits and name changes, without adequate current information being publicly available.
•Unsolicited Quotes — The security has only been quoted on an unsolicited basis since it entered the public markets and the issuer has not made adequate current information available to the public.
•Other Public Interest Concern — There is, in Pink OTC Markets' view, a public interest concern.

Consequently, Pink OTC Markets has removed the quotes from this website until adequate current information is made available by the issuer pursuant to Pink OTC Markets Guidelines for Providing Adequate Current Information (PDF) and until Pink OTC Markets believes there is no longer a public interest concern. Investors are encouraged to use care and due diligence in their investment decisions. Please read our Investor Protection page for more information.

This whole business about sending off to an independent lab, however belated the news release is, is simply bogus.

The measure of how effective their process is cannot be measured by standard scientific material composition tests. They have to subject the material to a comparative test of what the material composition was prior to it being subjected to their "alledged" pre-treatment and what characteristics were retained by the material after the testing. This is true for the free occuring sugars first and then for all of the rest of the compositional molecular strucutres of the materials.

After all of this then the material has to be subjected to a fermentation vs time vs mass basis which will then give you the ability to make a definitive determination of the continuous flow fermentation volume that can be done. The CFFV can only be calculated from another set of variables that are strictly related to the strain of microbe being used as the fermentation medium and the enzyme loading that is required for conversion of the higher order cellulose and hemicellulose to be broken down.

Of course Mr. Shearer nor Ms. Delany do not have any knowledge or technical experience for establishing controlled procedures, let alone know how the process even works, nor how to design and build a continuous flow fermenter. Assuming even on the surface that they are trying to actually develop a legitimate operation, there is also a problem with one very critical issue - they still haven't beat the molecular bulk density equation to the degree that they are not going to have some serious economic problems based on transportation and handling of the material. So even if they have magically stumbled upon a pre-treatment process that does what they claim to do, they do not have a practical application until that issue is solved!

Furthermore, if they have managed to replicate ATNE's technology, then it would appear that they have a big problem as violating the signed NDAs they previously have with them: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2008_May_12/ai_n25406262/

The question can be simply answered by asking Microlab this question:
"Does the samples contain esterified lignin?". If the answer is "no", then the samples provided to them are stolen directly from ATNE as their process separates out the lignin from the process. If the answer is "yes", then GAEC is not doing anything new and simply taking existing process technology (i.e. Vortex Ventures equipment) - either way, the answer will implicate GAEC as a complete hoax.

repost/updated from yahoo: 2008 financials out -
Most notably (and laughably!) is this statement about the Beneficial owners:

Firemark Capital, LLC
Joe Schmoe, Manager & Resident Agent 4,557,260 shares (9.0%)
Address: 1947 Sparrow Ridge Road (according to Harris County Tax Records, this is Jack and Rowanne Uselton's home address)

IBIS Energy, LLC
Joe Schmoe, Manager & Resident Agent 4,755,420 shares (9.4%)
Address: 615 Flaghoist Lane (according to Harris County Tax Records, this is Darrel and Lorena Uselton's home address)**

**According to Fort Bend County, TX Tax Records, Darrel just purchased a new home for $825,000 on March 14, 2008 at 10111 W HIDDEN LAKE LN, RICHMOND, TX. 77469. The property has an assessed value of $1,036,380 and was bought with "cash".

"Joe Schmoe" - LOL!!! Why not just call them Beavis and Butthead? Everyone knows that Darrel and Jack Uselton, are the owners of each of these companies!! GEEEZZZ - call a spade a spade will ya?

If you may recall, the Company made this 2007 statement:
"On July 17, 2007 the Board of Directors, after becoming aware of an investigation of Darrel and Jack Uselton for securities related matters, resolved that the Company and all officers and directors should sever all business relationships with Darrell Uselton, Jack Uselton and any entities controlled by the Uselton’s. In order to separate the company from the Useltons all of the shares held by the Uselton’s or their entities were subsequently purchased by Galleria Asset Management, Inc. The President of Galleria Asset Management, Inc. is John Thomas Cloud and is located at 160 Wimberly Ranch Drive, Wimberly, TX 78676. The registered agent is William A. Carmichael"

Yet, quite disturbing, the opposite appears to be true. Notwithstanding Darrel and Jack's other 8.457 million share holdings (pre-split) through Tejas Capital, Accelerator Partners, Brazos Capital and Valores Fund which may or may not have been absorbed through Galleria Asset Management, the net portolio appears to actually INCREASE for Ibis and Firemark!!

In 2007, Ibis Energy (Darrel Uselton) was issued 112,770 shares of GFET (2.255 million pre-split), yet his current holdings are now 4.755 million. Similarly, in 2007, Firemark (Jack Uselton) was issued 7500 shares (150k pre-split) while his holdings now have dramatically increased to 4.557 million shares!! Say it ain't so Kathleen!! WTF!

Other items of note:
Typo carry over from 3rd qtr financials - corporate phone number should be 713-461-9229, not 713-463-9229.

New website noted in financials as: http://www.gulfalternativeenergy.com/ . Typos on website still erroneously show the stock ticker as GEAC instead of GAEC.

Outstanding shares ballooned from 47,086,265 to 50,586,265 in the last quarter alone (7.4% increase for the quarter, 29% increase for the year). Personal ATM Shares issued for cash include 1.0 million shares at an average price of $0.025/share, and 2.5 million shares issued for debt conversion generaing $225k in proceeds.

"We do not have enough cash to satisfy our capital requirements for the next twelve months"

"We currently have few assets ($15k) and no income."

"Our general and administrative expenses decreased from $4,154,833 for the year ended December 31, 2007 to $606,071 for the same period ended December 31, 2008." - congratulations - guess William Carmichael and JT Cloud are officially retired! However, with Kathleen's salary now at $21k per year, what is the other $585k for??!?

GAEC has an accumulated deficit during the development stage of $6,619,931 as of December 31, 2008 and a working capital deficit of $319,215 at December 31, 2008.

Gulf Alternative Energy is still a development stage company

Left over business from the "old" management: On February 13, 2007 we granted options to two shareholders who were included in the original offering, to purchase up to an additional six million shares. These options had an exercise price equal to the par value of the common shares ($0.0001) and must be exercised within one year. As of December 31, 2007, all of the six million options had been exercised, resulting in a cash receipt of $600 (YUP! - that's right, $600 bucks for 6 million shares - now THERE is fiscal responsibility for ya!).

"We have one full-time employee and no part-time employees" - Kathleen still a one-woman show!

Why would anyone think things have changed?

Kathleen's business acumen at leading a fledgling developmental healthcare startup company into oblivion (MYHA.pk), while being well over 4 weeks tardy in communicating the corporate news, and still not being current with the SEC filings, while making it entirely unclear where the corporate headquarters is (Houston vs. San Antonio vs. Lake Charles, Blalock Road vs. Long Point Rd. vs Post Oak Blvd. vs. IH 35, etc...), sloppy website, etc....

Just wondering if Kathleen's middle name might be Sybil....
http://www.fmsfonline.org/sybil.html

Not sure if Carmichael leaving makes gaec less likely of being a fraud. Does anyone think this company will actually do something now with the ceo change or is it just more dog and pony.

I am unsure why Kathleen made this announcement as it was already evident that she had taken control as early as over 4 weeks ago on March 27th press release announcing the name change (http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Gulf-Ethanol-Evolves-to-Gulf-bw-14726267.html?.v=1) as well as knowing that William Carmichael had fled the coop for a new company literally a block down the road with "Proven Technologies" (http://www.proventechllc.com/managementteam.html). Curious statement by Kathleen stating that the corporate website is "updated", when it is still lacking any meaningful information on what exactly GAEC does, and also still contains numerous errors, like the glaring one for the symbol name being incorrectly shown as "GEAC".

Maybe details of the companies technology being less than elaborated on is not so surprising, as it would appear William has replicated the same at his new company: http://www.proventechllc.com/shredders.html

Maybe it is instead the fact that the latest financials indicate that the technology isn't quite ready for commercial applications and is needing further refinement/modifications.

Gulf Alternative Energy Announces Changes
May 4, 2009 7:55:00 AM
Copyright Business Wire 2009


Email Story Discuss on ZenoBank

View Additional ProfilesHOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Gulf Alternative Energy Corporation (PinkSheets:GAEC) announced today that it has appointed Kathleen Delaney to serve as its new Chairman and CEO. Ms. Delaney brings experience in management and in the practice of law to the leadership of the Company.

In addition, the company has updated its web-site and invites those interested in the Company to visit www.GulfAlternativeEnergy.com for an update on the Company. Gulf is focused on commercializing its cellulose pre-processing technology and on expanding its green technology portfolio.

Transforming cellulose to ethanol efficiently is a technical challenge that will transform the biofuels industry. Gulf Alternative Energy believes it has moved the industry much closer to economic viability with its preprocessing technology that turns non-food plant material (called biomass) into extremely small particles that can more quickly and more cheaply be turned into ethanol.

About Gulf Alternative Energy Corporation

Gulf Alternative Energy is an alternative energy company focused on the development of the alternative energy industry with a particular emphasis on Texas and the Gulf Coast.

For more information, visit www.gulfalternativeenergy.com.

Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: This news release contains forward-looking information within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including statements that include the words "believes," "expects," "anticipate" or similar expressions. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the company to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In addition, description of anyone's past success, either financial or strategic, is no guarantee of future success. This news release speaks as of the date first set forth above and the company assumes no responsibility to update the information included herein for events occurring after the date hereof.




Source: Gulf Alternative Energy Corporation


----------------------------------------------
Gulf Alternative Energy Corp.
Kathleen Delaney
713-461-9229

Yea, this company is shaddy...I had 10,000 shares and now have 500 worth a few hundred bucks. I am saving this one to write off as a loss end of tax season this year. Don't like this one at all and I think they put out a lot of fluff PR about big contracts in Brazil ect...

This hurts. When they did the 1/20 split .03 cents became .60 cents. The stock briefly went to .90 cents and has dropped like a rock ever since. Today it closed at .30 which is equal to .015 before the split. Needless to my stock is worth virtually nothing

New name, same game....btw...anyone think the name change and reverse split was a way to defer publicity to Jack and Darrel Uselton (former GFET CEO) settling civil charges with the SEC while still trying to settle the criminal charges leveled by the Texas OAG?

http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2009/lr20961.htm

Name Change and new symbol GAEC

Intentions of Gulf Ethanol Corporation (GFET.PK)

As Gulf Ethanol Corporation (GFET.PK) states, they do not have any significant operations at this time. However, the company intends to become a developer and constructor of ethanol and ethanol feed stock manufacturing facilities. Unfortunately, sometimes intentions remain only intentions. The share price has been dropping gradually from the middle of 2007. Besides, one more new stroke my eye: Ahead Of The Bulls has been compensated 75,000 free trading shares to promote GFET.PK.

This entry was posted on Thursday, May 22nd, 2008 at 12:59 pm and is filed under Penny Stock Promoters.

2 Responses to “Intentions of Gulf Ethanol Corporation (GFET.PK)”
cruela Says:

December 8th, 2008 at 11:03 am
Yeah, the stock has been going down for some time….nothing nice, I would say…

Adam Says:

December 5th, 2008 at 4:28 am
if you check out my blog, you will see why GFET has done so poorly.
Go to main page click blog and search GFET in searchbar

http://www.pinkinvesting.com/2008-05-22/intentions-of-gulf-ethanol-corporation-gfetpk/

thank you, and the same to you sir,moreover, thank you for the information.

Thanks - for the record, I sincerely want people to make money with their investments, and as such, people should take my comments with the grain of salt and NOT a direct endorsement to buy, sell, trade, go long or short in this or any other stock.

Off topic - penny stocks, with proper discipline, can be a profitable way to make money as sometimes you do find a diamond in the rough. A few years back, during the irrational market of the late 90's, I found one in a company called DCH Technology (DCHT). The stock ended up on the AMEX for a short period before collapsing under the weight of the overall market crash. The reason I bring it up is that the same individuals that ran that company, have a new venture: EIPC http://www.enableipc.com/ . Seasoned management, who are technically at the top of their game, might be worth a crap shoot on that stock. I am not an investment advisor, so suggest doing your own DD, but for what it is worth, I have personally met management and have personal faith in them and know that they have a real product with real promise. From a stock play, they need some exposure as the chart is not so impressive.

zekel, your research (if accurate, and I have no reason to believe it's not) is second to none. These pennies are a cesspool. I keep dreaming I will find a stock that miraculously can make it. I'm quite confident GFET will never be such a stock. The irrational share volume is all I need to know this. (I've been in the pennies for 10 years and never have seen a stock trade like GFET.)

Mainly just wanted to say I'm impressed. And I'm only allowed 3 posts a day now (for pimping another stock across iHub) so for me to use a post thanking a stranger such as yourself, I really am quite impressed. :0)

New information to share:
For those of you that recall the press release back in April where GFET announced a Letter of Intent to purchase an Ethanol Plant from SMS Environmental and move it to an undisclosed location in Central America, there is some additional history on this.

SMS changed their name to Sunrise Solar (OTC:SSLR) a few months ago, and has stated in their financials that the plant in question has been sold off to Cargill, Inc. as part of a settlement for previously delinquent debt owed to Cargill. This debt was to have been paid to them beginning in September 2007. By SSLR's own admission in their financials, they only satisfied enough payments to carry them through about December 2007. What is disturbing is that the LOI with GFET was after this fact, when SSLR is believed to have known definitively that the plant had a lien on it and was the likely subject of an impending settlement with Cargill.

One might ask, "so what - how does that affect me here at GFET?". The answer is not so complicated - it has been reported that SSLR's CEO, Eddie Austin, is related to GFET's JT Cloud (cousins?). You should also know that one of SSLR's officers is Thomas Cloud (JT's son). So with the explicit knowledge and non-arms length transaction that was allegedly supposed to go through betweeen SSLR and GFET, both companies management knew it would never go through, but it sure might look good on the books (re: stock price) to have a sale (SSLR revenue stream) and a new, 1st, operating plant (GFET).

But wait, the story gets thicker over the last couple of weeks! Thomas Cloud's other company, Telemedicus (OTC: TMDI - the "virtual ambulance" company), suddenly, and inexplicably decided to change their company focus via an unannounced 1:20 R/S and name change to National Wind Solutions (OTC: NWND). The only company information we have to date (received posthomulously a week later) is that they "announced new management" (names withheld for some strange reason), moving to a new corporate office (which by the way, I drove by and found it to be unoccupied), and a new investor contact: Kathleen Delany. No surprise to me, but perhaps to others, Ms. Delany is also the CEO of My Healthy Access (OTC: MYHA), a company that was supposed to have an equity stake bought out by Cloud's TMDI company, but mysteriously fell through. Also of no surprise to me, Kathleen is a partner in Eddie Austin's Lake Charles Law firm. Can things get any more incestious than this?

The whole thing just smells fishy to me...anyone else share my feelings or is this all "coincidence" that the trail from Jack and Darrell Uselton has found its way here?

fair enough - please accept the apology - I came on a bit strong.

i wasnt aware of all that you talk about, i appreciate the info...still thats no way to come at me, i respect and expect respect, if its information that helps out the share holders im all in, thank you

"given the right promotion and exposure Gulf Ethanol has a chance to be in the lime light IMO"

That of course, is ridiculous to make such a statement. The Company is a self described "developmental" company, with management having little to no experience in the industry, a penchant for spewing out dozens of press releases promising "letters of intents", "engagements" with other companies, "intentions" of buying ethanol plants, opening up offices, and touting on their website that they have seasoned business history of buying, trading, and producing ethanol, when it is clear from their own financials, that they have never done any of the above.

Even if they actually get to the point of jointly developing a preprocessing unit, the company has no financial wherewithall, no employees, and no experience in marketing such a product. Notwithstanding these small obstacles, the stated agreement with Vortex Ventures is to simply be a distributor/servicer of the product - the financial arrangements for profit on such venture are non-disclosed, but certainly GFET has no such servicing staff to actually support such an operation.

The whole fascade of such a venture is just laughable on its face.

In the alternative, if your comments are to suggest this would be a good stock play due to the illusion of having a real company, I believe they already tried that game back in July 2007 when they hired Chet Gutowski as an independent analyst to pump this dog. What they failed to mention in their disclosure was that Chet is part owner of (GFET major shareholder, Jonathan Gilchrist's companies: ), Goldbridge Capital and Southfield Energy, both located in the same office suite as GFET.

This whole company reeks of deceit in my opinion.

Wash trading - i.e. the illegal practice of trading shares between accounts to give the appearance of liquidity.

The allegations, as outlined in the Federal (SEC) and State (Texas OAG) indictments of former GFET CEO, Darrel Uselton, and his uncle, Jack Uselton, they allege that there were numerous wash trades performed as a common practice by these individuals on the 35 companies referenced ("Operation Spamalot"). The trial procedures for these two individuals are ongoing with recent motions considered last month, and expected to move towards a docket sometime early next year, so at this point they deserve to be "presummed innocent", until proven otherwise.

However, disturbing to me are the numerous entities at GFET that were issued millions of shares:

Ibis Energy LLC Darrel Uselton 2,255,403
David Mordekhay David Mordekhay 1,585,000
Carly Long Carly Long 1,585,000
Oren Mizrahi Oren Mizrahi 1,585,000
Mark Schiller Mark Schiller 500,000
Firemark Capital, LLC Jack Uselton 150,000
Cloud Management JT Cloud 4,000,000
Oxford Funding JT Cloud 2,000,000
National Health Alliance, Inc. JT Cloud 2,000,000
Galleria Securities Corp. JT Cloud 2,000,000
The Internet Business Factory Jonathan Gilchrist 6,000,000
Hepplewhite Corporation Jonathan Gilchrist 2,000,000
Tejas Capital, Inc. Steven Lease* 2,000,000
Accelerator Partners, Inc. Darrel Uselton 2,000,000
Brazos Capital, Inc Jim Mobitty* 2,457,000
Valores Fund, L.P. Unknown* 2,000,000
Total 34,117,403

*Note: These three companies are previously known to be Darrel Uselton controlled entities.

It is my belief/speculation, although unconfirmed, that these entities continually churn shares between themselves to give the appearance of liquidity that we witness on a daily basis on this stock. There are many days that the company has no news items, and we see an irrational amount of activity on the stock.

wash trading?

need to update the i box

given the right promotion and exposure Gulf Ethanol has a chance to be in the lime light IMO

this one has potential to be a monster IMO

where has everyone been

good morning

Whoever is wash trading (IMO) this stock is pretty committed!

"How KDS enhances the production of Cellulosic Ethanol"

http://fasc.net/cellulosic-ethanol.php

FASC (unlike GFET) is the real deal. Watch and see.

70vwvert:

"gfet emphasis is on alternative sources of feed stock (NOT CORN) for the production of ethanol" - for clarity, GFET does not market, produce, or trade ethanol and I would envision that their new focus of producing this pre-processor technology would be applicable to any ethanol plant irrespective of feedstock.

"gfet has proven that its' method produces a feed stock that may be a competitive alternative to corn" - GFET has not proven anything yet except proclaiming they have turned on the machine and running some sorghum through it. By its own admission in its press release, they are asking for further modifications to the prototype unit, and have yet to announce definitive results of the first dry run, nor the scalability of such a unit on a larger scale.

"this action keeps the ethanol mandate at 9.5 million gallons vice 4.5 million gallons TX was asking" - the problem remains with the amount of mass needed for transportation in order to generate the same volume of ethanol by using non-food feedstock which is 4-6 times more mass. You either have to preprocess the feedstock at each farm location (which means you need a new infrastructure for storage and processing), or you need to put the preprocessors at the ethanol plants (which is a good idea), but you still have the increase in transport costs now.

"one more thing - if you are a meaningless basher disregard the above because it will make no difference in your message and consider this my last repsonse to you as you are probably paid by generating responses to you negative comments." - hope you find my comments not to be "meaningless".

FASC is the real deal. I am in GFET but FASC is still trading under the radar at .04. Go to http://KDSMicronex.com and http://fasc.net and find the next GFET. I would definately be buying both on Monday. But FASC is still only .04. Good luck all. FASC is a must DD for all GFET investors.


OG7

You figure it out, here is a start

gfet emphasis is on alternative sources of feed stock (NOT CORN) for the production of ethanol

gfet has proven that its' method produces a feed stock that may be a competitive alternative to corn

this action keeps the ethanol mandate at 9.5 million gallons vice 4.5 million gallons TX was asking

Texas recently announced its' interest in cellulosic sources of feed stock for ethanol production because imo TX would rather corn be fed to livestock ie cattle

do your own dd the information is there

one more thing - if you are a meaningless basher disregard the above because it will make no difference in your message and consider this my last repsonse to you as you are probably paid by generating responses to you negative comments.

Nice!!!!!!!
weeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!
:)

Nice move on that news!

"EPA Denies Texas' Request for Ethanol Waiver"

How is this relavent to this company? GFET has never produced, manufactured, traded, bought, sold, or bartered any ethanol EVER!

EPA Denies Texas' Request for Ethanol Waiver

Hopefully something will start to move the 'right'way. They need to be able to repeat this and have it veified as a viable process before I'm convinced and willing to stay. This is such a shaky company .