Where the PCBM Stuckholders now reside

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Live Updating

Older

Super2013

05/09/11 11:09 PM

Post #289

revoked stocks cant stay dead forever

Super2013

05/09/11 11:09 PM

Post #288

this board is buzzin on raging bull

Super2013

05/09/11 11:08 PM

Post #287

Re: #286: @Super2013 - Is it dead

good luck

Super2013

05/09/11 11:08 PM

Post #286

Is it dead

Stock

06/22/09 3:21 PM

Post #285

Re: #284: @Stock - SECURITY DELETIONS

Yet another board to shunt to the Talk category to prevent future wipe by an Admin.

Or at least REMOVE THE TICKER.

Stock

06/22/09 3:20 PM

Post #284

SECURITY DELETIONS

Dl Date Symbol Company Name Effective Date/Comments
7/7/2004 SRCI Serac Holdings, Inc. Common Stock 7/7/2004 12(j) Registration Revoked by SEC **

http://www.otcbb.com/asp/dailylist_search.asp?DirectSymbol=SRCI&OTCBB=ALL

puckhead

07/09/08 3:40 PM

Post #283

Is SRCI Dead

lifegear

08/21/06 9:58 PM

Post #282

Re: #281: @Billybob_TX - For those that miss Surfit's drug/viagra/too-much-sugar-addled rants, here

whatever happened to PCBM SRCI??? did they revive it in another shell or the company just gave up??

Billybob_TX Grandfathered

03/16/06 7:17 AM

Post #281

For those that miss Surfit's drug/viagra/too-much-sugar-addled rants, here he is: http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/memalias.cgi?board=all&member=lighting_truth_up

Susie924

06/30/05 7:59 PM

Post #280

Re: #278: @Dancing in the dark - 8 lbs 5 ounces 21.5 inches

Rest?

That word doesn't exist for you anymore Boris!!!!

I'm glad everyone is doing well!

fung_derf

06/30/05 7:13 PM

Post #279

Re: #278: @Dancing in the dark - 8 lbs 5 ounces 21.5 inches

Is this the fishing board?

Dancing in the dark Free

06/30/05 5:45 PM

Post #278

Re: #276: @Susie924 - I happened to find this by accident!!!!

8 lbs 5 ounces 21.5 inches
everybody is doing well.
everybody is tired.
i can't wait to go back to work to get some rest! 8)~

fung_derf

06/28/05 2:28 PM

Post #277

Re: #275: @Dancing in the dark - sophia born june 26th 9:30p via caesarian after

Is her middle name Dark or Hire?

edit: at the very least you could have named her Vincea or somesuch.

Susie924

06/27/05 5:57 PM

Post #276

Re: #275: @Dancing in the dark - sophia born june 26th 9:30p via caesarian after

I happened to find this by accident!!!! I was looking to see when you last posted and there it was!!!!

Congratulations Daddy!!!!

How big was she???
How is Mommy and baby doing????
Have you been able to stop smiling yet????

So many questions!!!!!

I am going to post this on the PCBM board!!

Dancing in the dark Free

06/27/05 12:57 PM

Post #275

sophia born june 26th 9:30p via caesarian after 36 hours of labor. *smile*

fung_derf

05/10/05 1:35 PM

Post #274

BEDROCK SHAREHOLDERS:

Scott Crane and Robert Siegel together owners of 394 shares of Bedrock Holdings
(197 each) shall together receive Sixty Seven Million Five Hundred Thousand
(67,500,000) shares of Capital Solutions I, Inc.

Scott Crane and Robert Siegel direct their shares of Capital Solutions I, Inc.
be issued as follows:

Federal One, Inc. - 20,000,000 shares;
North American Capital - 25,000,000 shares; and
Nothing Personal Just Business, Inc. - 22,500,000 shares;

Serac Holdings, Inc., the owner of 206 shares of Bedrock Holdings shall receive
a total of One Hundred and Twenty Five Million (125,000,000) shares of Capital
Solutions I, Inc. and hereby direct that its shares be issued in the name of
Serac Holdings, Inc.

ProfitChaser Grandfathered

02/25/05 5:27 PM

Post #273

Does anyone know if there is a way to get these SRCI shares out of my account. I am tired of looking at them. They show up in my account but when I try to sell them at market or any other price it says no way hosia. LOL

jmrsage

02/20/05 10:22 AM

Post #272

Am I missing something here? What are these people waiting for?

By: wondrwen1951
15 Feb 2005, 09:31 PM EST
Msg. 1157534 of 1157690
(This msg. is a reply to 1157530 by ezaltheladiespa.)
Jump to msg. #
Thank you for your great messages! I am still long SRCI, all certed and waiting for something good to happen and for the bashers to get their just due finally!Wendy

http://www.ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=SRCI&read=1157534

Dancing in the dark Free

02/17/05 12:11 PM

Post #271

Re: #270: @sydog1 - Has anyone reported SRCI as a capitol loss?

what was it the capitol of?
(sorry i couldn't resist)

sydog1

02/16/05 10:33 AM

Post #270

Has anyone reported SRCI as a capitol loss?

fung_derf

09/23/04 12:08 PM

Post #269

Re: #268: @pcjockey - To a point.

Nevermind. It would just give me a headache. It's enough to know that someone even tries.

pcjockey

09/23/04 11:39 AM

Post #268

Re: #267: @fung_derf - And that's what makes him so special to

To a point.

fung_derf

09/23/04 9:56 AM

Post #267

Re: #266: @pcjockey - I have no idea what he is saying.

And that's what makes him so special to all of us. How about guru. Any ideas?

pcjockey

09/23/04 7:55 AM

Post #266

Re: #265: @fung_derf - You mean you're not living through miltie?

I have no idea what he is saying.

fung_derf

09/22/04 4:43 PM

Post #265

Re: #264: @pcjockey - BnB.. with the exception of the occasional RB

You mean you're not living through miltie?

pcjockey

09/22/04 2:56 PM

Post #264

Re: #262: @BullNBear52 - I rarely get over to RB anymore since

BnB.. with the exception of the occasional RB and Red Sox fan forum post, I mostly lurk these days. Time slots don't exist the way they used to a couple years ago.

And I pretty much never check RB on weekends.

fung_derf

09/22/04 1:58 PM

Post #263

Re: #261: @occams_razor - I'll give you an example.

Interesting. Although both work for me, and I still don't get the difference, but that's ok. Perhaps I should sponsor their race team?

BullNBear52 PremiumMember

09/22/04 1:50 PM

Post #262

Re: #258: @pcjockey - hullo BnB52

I rarely get over to RB anymore since the demise of PCBM. You must visit more often.

occams_razor Grandfathered

09/22/04 1:49 PM

Post #261

Re: #257: @fung_derf - LOL! Yeah, that explains it to me! Is

I'll give you an example.

This URL is one obtained clicking on a Google image search object. It will work in ihub as long as I don't preview and edit the post.

[edit] doesn't work. See what I mean? here is a perfect demonstration on the usefulness of tinyurl.

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://user.txcyber.c
om/~james/AR/derf.gif&imgrefurl=http://user.txcyber.com/~jam
es/AR/team_derf.htm&h=210&w=401&sz=5&tbnid=mE04WrwAJesJ:&tbn
h=61&tbnw=118&start=14&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dderf%26hl%3Den%26l
r%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26sa%3DG

here is the tinyurl redirect. Points at the same page. This will post on most websites and will work here after a preview and edit where the giant link above will get chopped.

http://tinyurl.com/658pw

original link

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://user.txcyber.com/~james/AR/derf.gif&imgrefurl=http....

I edited the message. Look what happened to the link

occams_razor Grandfathered

09/22/04 1:45 PM

Post #260

Re: #256: @BullNBear52 - Yes but doesn't the link still work? I

depends on the website you post it on. Sometimes the link stops becoming a link and is just ordinary text after the first line feed.

It also gets around the preview and edit truncation that happens with long links on ihub. Like any other good idea, it took little time to be misused.

pcjockey

09/22/04 1:42 PM

Post #259

Re: #256: @BullNBear52 - Yes but doesn't the link still work? I

BnB... if a link breaks, well sometimes it breaks... if you get my drift.

pcjockey

09/22/04 1:41 PM

Post #258

Re: #253: @BullNBear52 - Well hello stranger.

hullo BnB52

fung_derf

09/22/04 1:34 PM

Post #257

Re: #255: @occams_razor - It was intended to allow really long URL's

LOL! Yeah, that explains it to me! Is that like a time warp?

BullNBear52 PremiumMember

09/22/04 1:32 PM

Post #256

Re: #255: @occams_razor - It was intended to allow really long URL's

Yes but doesn't the link still work? I don't use tinyurls and it seems that my links though long still are clickable.

occams_razor Grandfathered

09/22/04 1:28 PM

Post #255

Re: #254: @fung_derf - I don't understand the benefit to tinyurl?

It was intended to allow really long URL's to post without getting truncated by text wrap.

fung_derf

09/22/04 1:22 PM

Post #254

Re: #252: @pcjockey - I think u r correct re: blocking tinyurl.

I don't understand the benefit to tinyurl?

BullNBear52 PremiumMember

09/22/04 1:22 PM

Post #253

Re: #247: @pcjockey - Mark, a few random thoughts:

Well hello stranger.

pcjockey

09/22/04 1:09 PM

Post #252

Re: #251: @occams_razor - really? I wonder if they are blocking tinyurl.

I think u r correct re: blocking tinyurl. Haven't seen them work for a while now. Not surprising but annoying as all get out.

occams_razor Grandfathered

09/22/04 1:06 PM

Post #251

Re: #249: @pcjockey - Sorry, RB wouldn't let me post that info

really? I wonder if they are blocking tinyurl. If so, it's a good idea, tinyurl can cloak some really nasty things.

Try posting your info with the actual URL substituted for the tinyurl redirection link.

fung_derf

09/22/04 1:05 PM

Post #250

Re: #249: @pcjockey - Sorry, RB wouldn't let me post that info

No need to apologize. Just don't use the word "ilk" in any of your posts.

pcjockey

09/22/04 12:59 PM

Post #249

Re: #248: @fung_derf - Odd place to use for storage? I guess

Sorry, RB wouldn't let me post that info and I saw this board had kind of dried up.

fung_derf

09/22/04 11:56 AM

Post #248

Re: #247: @pcjockey - Mark, a few random thoughts:

Odd place to use for storage? I guess it's not being used for much else?

pcjockey

09/22/04 10:22 AM

Post #247

Mark, a few random thoughts:

ME or XP?

How to troubleshoot CD-ROM drive problems in Windows XP

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;314096

List of CD drive troubleshooting articles:

http://tinyurl.com/5xdj7

Some viruses can disable floppy drives, Michaelangelo for one.

Mobo issue maybe? Faulty hardware? I'd consider transferring
all over to CD and dump the floppy anyway.

Might see if a pcpitstop scan can help locate the problem:

http://www.pcpitstop.com/

500_and_Long Grandfathered

08/10/04 9:08 PM

Post #246

Re: #245: @fung_derf - You hold them both?? Do you also have

LOL

fung_derf

08/09/04 9:50 AM

Post #245

Re: #244: @joe758 - I HOLD PCBM AND SRCI STOCK AND WILL

You hold them both?? Do you also have CMKX? ECNC? WAVX?

joe758

08/08/04 11:28 PM

Post #244

Re: #243: @Susie924 - http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/34-49971.htm UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

I HOLD PCBM AND SRCI STOCK AND WILL HOLD A BUNCH OF NOTHING TILL SOMETHING COMES AROUND THATS Y I GOT INTO THEM IN THE FIRST PLACE

Susie924

07/07/04 10:29 AM

Post #243

Re: #242: @QBIDDOLLAR - SRCI IS DONE....I just got a call from

http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/34-49971.htm

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 49971 / July 6, 2004
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-11535

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In the Matter of

PINNACLE BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, INC.

Respondent.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
: ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC PROCEEDINGS, MAKING FINDINGS, AND REVOKING REGISTRATION OF SECURITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(j) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors that proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), against Pinnacle Business Management, Inc. ("Pinnacle" or "Respondent").

II.
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer of Settlement (the "Offer") which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or to which the Commission is a party and without admitting or denying the findings herein, except as to the Commission's jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these proceedings, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Public Proceedings, Making Findings, and Revoking Registration of Securities Pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Order"), as set forth below.

III.
On the basis of this Order and Respondent's Offer, the Commission finds that:

A. Pinnacle (d/b/a "Serac Holdings") is a Carson City, Nevada holding company that was incorporated in 1997. Pinnacle acquired a public shell company in a reverse merger in March 2000, and traded on the OTC Bulletin Board until December 2000, when it was delisted. Since that time, it has been quoted on the "Pink Sheets" under the ticker symbol "PCBM." The common and preferred stock of Pinnacle have been registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act.

B. Pinnacle has failed to comply with Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder, while its common stock was registered with the Commission. Pinnacle has not filed an Annual Report on Form 10-K since April 17, 2001, when it filed its annual report for the year ended December 31, 2000. Pinnacle has not filed any quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for any fiscal period subsequent to its fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2001.

C. Pinnacle's last filing of record with the Commission is a Form 8-K dated August 4, 2003. In this Form 8-K, Pinnacle announced that two officers had resigned and that the company had one remaining officer and director. This Form 8-K also disclosed "the company has no assets, no operating business and no sources of revenue."

D. On May 8, 2002, the Commission filed a civil action in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, alleging that on April 2, 2002, Pinnacle issued a false and misleading press release regarding a proposed spin-off of a Pinnacle subsidiary known as All Pro. In the press release, Pinnacle stated that after the spin-off to Pinnacle shareholders, All Pro would seek a listing on the American Stock Exchange and that its initial trading price would be $4.00 per share. The Commission's complaint alleged that Pinnacle lacked a reasonable basis for these statements. On December 15, 2003, the Court for the Middle District of Florida entered an order permanently enjoining Pinnacle from violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws. Pinnacle consented to the injunction without admitting or denying the allegations in the Commission's complaint. Consequently, Pinnacle failed to comply with Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.

IV.
Section 12(j) of the Exchange Act provides as follows:

The Commission is authorized, by order, as it deems necessary or appropriate for the protection of investors to deny, to suspend the effective date of, to suspend for a period not exceeding twelve months, or to revoke the registration of a security, if the Commission finds, on the record after notice and opportunity for hearing, that the issuer of such security has failed to comply with any provision of this title or the rules and regulations thereunder. No member of a national securities exchange, broker, or dealer shall make use of the mails or any means of instrumentality of interstate commerce to effect any transaction in, or to induce the purchase or sale of, any security the registration of which has been and is suspended or revoked pursuant to the preceding sentence.

In view of the foregoing, the Commission finds that it is necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors to impose the sanction specified in Respondent's Offer.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Exchange Act, that registration of each class of Respondent's securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act be, and hereby is, revoked.

By the Commission.

Jonathan G. Katz
Secretary

QBIDDOLLAR Free

07/07/04 10:25 AM

Post #242

SRCI IS DONE....I just got a call from the trading desk that the FCC has removed SRCI from trading thru a 12J registration...whatever that is! I was told to get a no value letter and claim the loss.

SRCI IS NO MORE.

fung_derf

06/24/04 11:58 AM

Post #241

Re: #240: @rickguy6 - derf...do you think technical analysis applies with scam

Sure. The charts have no emotion. The only problem is, sometimes at these low prices, an order slips through with not enough zero's. So it screws up the charts.
I remember years ago when I predicted based on the charts that PCBM would dip to .02. Some guy wanted to bet me that would never happen! Of course, his alias vanished shortly after......Ahhhhhhh, the good ol' days!

rickguy6

06/24/04 11:52 AM

Post #240

Re: #239: @fung_derf - Let me know when you've turned blue.

derf...do you think technical analysis applies with scam stocks? It's hard to believe it does and probably even harder to try to figure out HOW it does.