Fine. We have checks for the spammers. We have checks for the Chairman.
Now, How de we trust you and have checks for you?
I have been following this for a little while, and lurking on a few other threads, and you seem to allow certain people more liberty and I find you are not consistent. Yet, whomever you convinced to get the position must either be very naive or trust you very much? Which was it?
If the young fellow named Matt made the decision, what did he base his judgment on to hire you? You seem to have more detesting your style than supporting it, and that maybe skewed because my understanding is that this Frank gentleman was suspended because of his past rather than what he was doing here.
If we have someone that executes very strong controls over this new concept, well my personal opinion is...This won't last!!!
Comments or suggestions from all welcomed!
Kat
