InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 17023
Next 10
Followers 3
Posts 302
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/12/2005

Re: calbiker post# 9530

Tuesday, 04/04/2006 12:38:00 AM

Tuesday, April 04, 2006 12:38:00 AM

Post# of 17023
Good News is easy to deliver, I think...

THE FOLLOWING IS MORE OR LESS CORRECT> IF YOU WANT VERBATIM, BUY a TRANSCRIPT>
I HEREBY DISCLAIM ANY ERRORS OR OVERSTATEMENTS OR FALSEHOODS>

Instructions to jury;
1 Asserted claims are not limited to a narrow multiplexed bus,
And non-use of a NMB is not grounds for non-infringement.
1.b Whiney reserves the right to explore invalidity as they assert
That the (NMB) description doesn’t support the issued claims.
2. Undisputed that whiney parts receive an op code.
3. Undisputed that DDR includes an external clock as construed by the court.

More of laytor crossxm;

Exploration of his non-infring testimony;
Regarding ‘non-use’ of ATR register,
They explore that a code representative of a # of clocks to transpire before ‘
Is indeed loaded into the ‘mode register’. ‘918c24 Cas latency, blah blah…

Regarding ‘105c34, ‘nonuse’ of ‘coupling internal clock to output driver circuitry’,
Look to block diagram, which shows exactly the thing. Much obfuscation by laytor.
His response pattern is now like a tristate gate;
either Yes, No, or ‘Lengthy indeterminate answer when he obviously doesn’t want to admit error.’

Regarding laytor’s ‘is not coupled’ testimony,
He does admit that the gated timing pulses cause output of data.

Regarding Variable Delay line ( vs. whiney ‘Selectable delay Network’),
First a recent Swedish text showing inverter chain VDL,
Then a 2004 patent, (which laytor is happily says won’t do because of date),
Then a 1989 MBI patent showing a variable digital delay line or circuit. Oops…
Laytor; “ I see the words, but don’t understand what you're trying to get at…”


(At this point on the TV court shows, the atty usually asks “Permission to treat the witness as hostile”,
But rocky just moves on to the next point, and it is sufficiently obvious about the obstreperous mr laytor.)

Regarding output data In Response To (IRT) Rising edge or Falling Edge
Exploration of the differential clocks ‘crossing points’ ,
Finally (I think) a diagram showing that CLK has a rising edge and a falling edge,
That does exactly correspond to the ‘crossing points’ of the differential signals,
And is thus a (practiced) subset.
Laytor keeps insisting that clockbar is also needed, looking increasingly odd.

Regarding readreq ‘918c24,
Back to the sdram data sheet p12, to show read has a different opcode
(A10) vs readwithou autoPRecharge. Also the rd w/autoPc is not interruptible,
But the normal read can be stopped early.
Laytor ; “The autoprecharge IS interruptible; it merely causes the memory content to become corrupted.”

At some point like this, rocky was done with laytor, and furnace deployed an immediate smokescreen fusillade speech to the jury (and sounding a bit desperate to me)...…

1. Regarding hindsight, furnace tries more smoke/mirrors, that the search for prior art was indeed
Based on hindsight, which is only common sense. They happily ignore that the obviousness analysis is the one
That is supposed to be done without benefit of hindsight.
2. Different porpoise for their caslatency.
3. Again with the ‘crossing points’ of the clock, vs. RE-FE of single clock, (even though there’s one in there)…
4. Output data IRT edges; ‘we don’t do that’ ( it just looks that way)
5. DLL-VDL, ah, something about that either Johnson or Lofgren was not cited, rmbs said they were equivalent…
6. Voltage Controlled Delay Line was implied to POOSITA by term VDL,
7 Claims not supported by written description, and were not inventive...”
8. BUS has not explained their patents, only whiney, And Why NOT?
At this point rocky deftly objected that they hadn’t gotten to that part of the trial yet… sustained… Breaktime;

Graham Allen will speak about jedec and ‘standard parts’, without his demonstrative.
Carl Everett from Intel tamale?
Weinstein demonst; Big long discussion about his latebreaking ‘effective royalty analysis’.
Central issue is that whiney projected 16% growth at time they signed a lumpsum agreement, but had >1000% over the term, so question is what the parties had in mind when they signed. This was tabled for later.

Rmbs concerned that instructions regarding laytor testimony don’t address testimony in the record. This may have gotten fixed in the instructions, (about which later a juror question reflected ongoing confusion.)

A mosaid jedec knight to the stand. A lot of details elicited,
Heavy repetition of ‘required to include (caslatency, autoPC, burstlength, DDR, DLL, etc.) to meet jedec standards.
Rocky very deftly dispatches this whole load apparently at a sidebar,
Where he arranged for the court to say the following phrase which totally neutralized the jedec issue I think;
“Jedec is not Prior Art, and is not relevant to questions of infringement.” Poof…

Jury goes out about now;
We hear a Nicely stated plea to allow Crisp testimony regarding his
“I couldn’t see an escape from the NMB”, and claim he was a POOSITA.
Later said 'the scales fell from my eyes' after carp.
Whiney VERY much wants to say that if the ~expert crisp couldn't see beyond the NMB, then a POOSITA couldn't have done it.

Bus says that Crisp was not an expert on patents,
and mistakenly thought that only the 'preferred embodiment' could be claimed.
The court says POOSITA is about a ‘community’, not individuals.
Carp and the berg can be crossxamed for their statements that the later claims are supported by the original application.

Back to the wienstein analysis of hypothetical royalty rate negotiation of 2000;
A very long sidebar. The bailiff interrupts to get the jury excused. They are sent out, then home.
Initially the court, rocky and furnace are all smiling as they talk. Long sidebar…
I mention to infringeon2k3 that they’re playing for all the marbles right now…
Later furnace is talking a lot, can’t see rocky. Then furnace asks a question of nicely. Unenthusiastic approval.
Even more sidebar. Finally they break. Rocky comes to speak to his peers in the gallery (perrier, random, and ?).
Each of the 3 has some kind of ~muted happy dance posture thing. Mr. ? has the best control, and only has a well-suppressed smiley face of extended duration, but something good has happened or at least a bad thing avoided, IMHO. I can’t see rocky face,
But he really wanted to tell them the news.

At this point, discussion of the future schedule. I leave early to make up for not being late to the start.
I may easily have some stuff out of order. Person Of Ordinary Skill In The Art.
I still can see none of the jury, ask some of the LTL army who attended.
LOLo


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent RMBS News