InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,048.42
(
-0.46%
)
US TECH 100
17,152.80
(
1.03%
)
Dow Jones
38,085.80
(
-0.98%
)
Brent Oil
88.04
(
-0.12%
)
Bitcoin
64,353.65
(
-0.20%
)
Post# of 10217
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Vexari

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 373
Posts 46266
Boards Moderated 11
Alias Born 07/20/2003

Vexari

Member Level

Re: None

Thursday, 06/08/2006 6:26:55 PM

Thursday, June 08, 2006 6:26:55 PM

Post# of 10217
follow up on american common law..

A few days ago, we sent out a response by Richard Cornforth in regard to his misunderstanding of the common law..

I will keep this in short form. Anyone that has further questions may write..

The Coalition, having a general understanding of the structure of the American union of states, has not fallen prey to the likes of the legal system under the “United States” CONstitution..

And in regard to those that think that the Income Tax is “Theft by Deception”, that is only the tip of the iceberg, as it is said..

Something much larger has been taken from the peoples of the Union..

In regard thereof, something is created by the Fourteenth Amendment (section 2) of which I refer to it as: Legislation without Representation. After you read the following, maybe you will understand what is just been stated..

To start, until people cut-out the brainwashing done by the elite in its goal of enslaving everyone into mammon, they will not understand the legal system and its inherent traps..

The general trap is: Federal Common Law..

This is a creature—or rather monster—that is created by the federation of states..

This monster is even further amplified due to the infamous Fourteenth Amendment..

Due to implementation of this unlawful amendment, what has ensued is a Black Hole of legal fictions (presumptions) and undisclosed/unwitting contracts. A component that the so-called Federal Common Law encompasses is a doctrine referred to as: Conflicts of Law..

If you were to investigate this term, you will find that its origin is grounded in International Law. So, what does that tell us?.

This is the crux of the matter: Each state in the Union is a nation. All of you “Americans” are being treated as US nationals: what I—and law— refer to as denizens: One that is admitted into a country and given privileges as a “citizen”, a US citizen, better yet: a vassal..

Now, back in reference to the so-called American common law that most think is law, here is the authority that shows that the American system of law used by the legal profession is a sham, not to mention dangerous:

The maxim of law (immemorial common law) below states that the so-called “common law” (case law) IS NOT law..

Apices juris non sunt jura. Points of law are not laws..*

Now this reference from a rare law dictionary that generally only judges have, Ballentine’s Law Dictionary, 3rd edition:

Point of law. A matter of law, as distinguished form a matter of fact, involved in a case of controversy. See PRECEDENT..

In American law, precedent is defined as “common law”.
The law that Richard Cornforth, and others, have been told is common law. Points of law are determinations by a judge of which is grounded in the facts brought forth to him in a case.

Although law can be derived from case law, there is another thing that most people fail to realize is that: a judge has a thing called “legal fiction” in his bag of tricks. He can add anything to the facts brought forth in a case that he wants..

These legal fictions—sometimes referred to as silent judicial notice—can be either negative or positively used..

The main legal fiction is: All Americans are US citizens and nationals, see Title 8 of the United States Code, section 1401, and Fourteenth Amendment (see p.s.)..

Other matters can be brought into being, such as the custom and usage: common law of the nation or society. Again defined in Blacks, sixth deluxe, as:

“A usage or practice of the people, which, by common adoption and acquiescence, and by long and unvarying habit, has become compulsory, and has acquired the force of a law with respect to the place of subject-matter to which it relates. It results from a long series of actions, constantly repeated, which have, by such repetition and by uninterrupted acquiescence, acquired the force of a tacit (silent) and common consent. An habitual or customary practice, more or less widespread, which prevails with a geographical area or sociological area.” [See Black’s for more info. Also look at Law of Nations]

Note it stated: UNINTERUPTED ACQUIESCENCE. The so-called Civil War broke that general consent. The Fourteenth Amendment stealthily brought that negation of consent (force) into all the states, not just the Southern states. There is now this “nation” that is CREATED by the Fourteenth Amendment. This creates a new system of “tacit” common law under the doctrine of custom and usage. That is why there are so many opinions of judges that argue back-and-forth what Federal Common Law is..

Again, I reinstate to this discussion that all statute law has to be in conformity with the law of consent to be public. This doctrine:

It is a general rule that when the provision of a statute is general, everything which is necessary to make such provision effectual is supplied by the common law. Co. Litt. 235; 2 Inst. 222.

Simply put: the Union is being run under a system of private law, very little statute law can be deemed public law..

In summary: Each matter has its own facts, and nothing can be used as precedent. Legal fictions can pollute a case. Anyone that lets case law be used by his opponent is letting down his guard, and ultimately being lumped into the mass of vassals…

But, most so-called “Americans” are anyway..

I ask: Are you an “American” as the mysterious ‘Ad Council’ sets forth…

“The Communists are further reproached with eliminating countries and nationalities” Communist Manifesto, 1848

And: “By country is meant the state of which one is a member.” Definition of COUNTRY, Bouviers Law Dictionary, 1856

And, the Civil War (so-called), which brought about the Fourteenth Amendment, circa 1865.

Accordingly, in view of these facts, I must ask: What is the name of your Country? And, can you say: Adverse Possession?

Maybe now you understand why the Communist Manifesto mandates public school education…

“There is Tranquility in Ignorance, but Servitude is its Partner.” –LB Bork

Strive for Freedom, LB Bork, Illinois national


“During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.” –George Orwell

p.s. Please do not send me any arguments that the Fourteenth Amendment is a fraud, or that it only applies to “African Americans”, or other common arguments. They can all be defeated with doctrines of International Law and other legal maxims derived from facts: Do you vote? Did your father vote? Did you grandfather vote? Do you have a Federal loan? Do you get mail delivered to your home? Do you have “Civil Rights”? Do you collect Social Security? Do you have a Social Security Number assigned to you and do you use it? Do you have children in the Public School system? Do you claim your freedom of speech under the “First Amendment” of the US Constitution via the Fourteenth Amendment? Do you use Federal Reserve Notes without having a problem with it? Are you a constituent of you so-called State Representative? Etc., etc, etc. Then, you are “Subject to the jurisdiction of IT.



Invito beneficium non datur. No one is obliged to accept a benefit against his consent. But if he does not dissent he will be considered as assenting.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.pacinlaw.org/inside/in_red.htm

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

* The law arises out of the fact {Ex facto jus oritur}; Facts are more powerful than words {Facta sunt potentiora verbis}; No proof is incumbent on him who denies a fact {Factum negantis nulla probatio}; That which appears not is not {Quod non apparet non est}; What is not read is not believed {Quod non legitur, non creditur}; What is proved by the record ought not to be denied {Quod per recordum probatum, non debet esse negatum}





http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1301769


I am now quite sure that 'Tragedy and Hope' was suppressed although I do not know why or by whom. ~ Carroll Quigley

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up