InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,116.17
(
0.32%
)
US TECH 100
17,314.40
(
0.43%
)
Dow Jones
38,386.09
(
0.38%
)
Brent Oil
87.29
(
-0.45%
)
Bitcoin
63,710.06
(
1.13%
)
Post# of 33332
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

rrm_bcnu

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 13
Posts 3872
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/09/2005

rrm_bcnu

Re: Captain James Kirk post# 15726

Wednesday, 08/30/2006 3:04:40 AM

Wednesday, August 30, 2006 3:04:40 AM

Post# of 33332
More FUD

The year-over-year Q1 for 2006 vs 2005

Net Loss:

Again, regarding net loss, we must remove the beneficial interest expense of $8,679,000 from the figure reflected in the financial statements of $9,437,270, which then gives us an actual net loss of $812,184.
When we compare the actual net loss from Q1 2006 of $812,184, vs. the net loss of Q1 2005 of $2,507,552, this represents a decrease of 68%.

https://www.otcstockinfo.com/repository/671/671_FR12.pdf pg17

► Any comment provided is my personal assessment/opinion of the indicated stock. "When the gods wish to punish you, they grant your wishes. Therefore be careful of what you wish for."

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up