Sunday, January 25, 2004 3:30:08 PM
Nicely put it upside down. Well, if I had not lived through IBM dropping the ball on PCs a while ago (did you, too?) I could maybe follow your argument.
However, I agree: As long as Athlon64 is running 32-bit systems faster than everything else, there is no problem. Now, executing 32-bit software under WoW within a 64-bit OS is another game. Not if it is considered as just legacy-compatibility, but as long as the vast majority of code will still be 32-bit.
But that is due next year only if I read the tealeaves right.
(It's counterintuitive, but imo AMD currently (and going forward all the way through this year) is not at all disadvantaged by the lack of Windows-AMD64).
K.
Facts are irrelevant to the emotional brain
Recent AMD News
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM
