InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1060
Posts 44342
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 07/07/2002

Re: ajtj99 post# 254913

Tuesday, 06/08/2004 9:16:49 PM

Tuesday, June 08, 2004 9:16:49 PM

Post# of 704019
I think that the May 2001 highs will be breached (the reason is quite simple, the May bottom here had the "qualities" of a major bottom including the double bottom testing feature, typically good for 30% (2444), with an overshoot, the range of 2450/2550 is perfect. but not a 60% rise to the area of congestion in the January 2001 top (see #msg-2157946), thus a natural point will be within (not full closure) of a gap between these two numbers (2444 and the 2895/3050), but not much higher than about a 33% advance. The reason for not "going all the way" to the 2895 area is the time compression, I have, I calculated, till the middle of September before the market gets into real troubles (too many factors on that one, so I'll pass on the rationalization, read Maulding or Roach for details <g>). If the first phase is fast enough to justify raising the top, I think that not too many (except maybe Softie, Westpacific and Federal) will object if by mid August, I raise that target further. I have not heard too many complaint since I raised the top from 2390 to around 2500 (g).

AZH

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.