Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD): Some benchmarks for INTEL's Paxville Dua...

Reply Private New

Next 10 Prev Next

Send PM Follow Ignore

Followers	0
Posts	307
Boards Moderated	0
Alias Born	02/14/2004

AAMMDD

Re: None

Tuesday, 10/11/2005 2:44:03 AM

Tuesday, October 11, 2005 2:44:03 AM

Some benchmarks for INTEL's Paxville Dual core
DELL, 2CPU, 4 Core,2.8GHZ Paxville, specint_rate score
58.9

see
http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/res2005q3/cpu2000-20050902-04544.html
-----

HP, 2CPU, 4 Core, specint_rate score 75.0

see
http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/res2005q3/cpu2000-20050902-04600.html

----------------
Conclusion: HP's old 2P x86 server is 27.33% faster
than newest 2P D-Core Paxville Xeon DELL server in raw
integer performance

----------------------

DELL did not submit SpecFP results for 2CPU, 4CORE
paxville, so let's look at this as a reference:

DELL: 4CPU, 4 CORE, 3.66GHZ, SpecFP_rate score 34.4

see
http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/res2005q2/cpu2000-20050321-03924.html

---
HP: 2 CPU, 4 core, SpecFP_rate: 74.4

see
http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/res2005q3/cpu2000-20050902-04596.html

-----------
Conclusion:

In number crunching, HP's old 2P x86 server is 216.27%
faster than DELL's 4P 3.66GHZ Xeon server -- no wonder
DELL is too shy to submit its result for 2P 4 Core
Paxville running at 2.8GHZ.
DELL, 2 CPU, 4 Core,2.8GHZ Paxville, specint_rate
score 58.9

see
http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/res2005q3/cpu2000-20050902-04544.html
-----

HP, 2CPU, 4 Core, specint_rate score 75.0

see
http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/res2005q3/cpu2000-20050902-04600.html

----------------
Conclusion: HP's old dog 2P Opteron server is 27.33%
faster than newest 2P D-Core Paxville Xeon DELL server
in raw integer performance

----------------------

HP ProLiant ML570 G3, 4 dual core INTEL Xeon 7000,
2x2MB cache at 3.0GHZ, 8 core, 32 GB memory,
SPECint_2000 benchmark, achieved a 4 CPU (8 core)
result of 105.

see
http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20051010005...

HP's DL585, 4 Cpus, 8 core, 16GB memory, SpecInt_rate
score 144

see
http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/res2005q3/cpu2000-20050902-04580.html

-------------
Conclusion:

HP's old dog dual core Opteron is 37.14% faster than
futuristic(expected 2 months later) dual core Xeon
7000 at 3.0GHZ in integer performance.

-------------

Both DELL and HP did not submit SpecFP results for
2CPU, 4CORE paxville, so let's look at this as a
reference:

DELL: 4CPU, 4 CORE, 3.66GHZ, SpecFP_rate score 34.4

see
http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/res2005q2/cpu2000-20050321-03924.html

---
HP: 2 CPU, 4 core, SpecFP_rate: 74.4

see
http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/res2005q3/cpu2000-20050902-04596.html

-----------
Conclusion:

In number crunching, HP's old 2P Opteron is 216.27%
faster than DELL's 4P 3.66GHZ Xeon server -- no wonder
HP and DELL did not submit its specfp results for dual
core Xeon at 2.8 or 3.GHZ -- they don't want to
embarrass their friends at INTEL.

INTEL's principle architect Jonathan Douglas said
INTEL dual core is a kludge, he is so honest (
http://pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,122236,00.asp )

=========================================================
=========================================================
from news.zdnet.com
http://news.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=14077&messageID=282721&start=-...