InvestorsHub Logo

thumpermikeny

08/04/06 10:31 PM

#30418 RE: gaonmymind #30417

nice dd

OzarkDareDevil

08/04/06 10:31 PM

#30419 RE: gaonmymind #30417

Excerpt from JJ's merger example PR.

Qorus expects that, upon approval by a majority of its stockholders (voting together on an as-converted to Common Stock basis), it will change its corporate name and approve a 1-for-50 reverse stock split of its outstanding Common Stock


that is a 1 share for 50 reverse stock split. Please be honest.

petermic

08/04/06 10:35 PM

#30421 RE: gaonmymind #30417

gaonmymind:

Most of those are difficult to research - it would take a lot of time to pick through all the related filings.

SPEA though I'm familiar with. By the time that announcement was made, Sillerman had already bought about 98% of the stock at $0.10. Only at most 1 million shares remained in the float, if that.

So the extraordinary rise in the stock price amounted to at most about $6mm in market cap in publicly held stock. And that's with a company that had real underlying value coming to it - the Presley properties. Also, Sillerman brought to it a highly regarded reputation and plenty of capital backing - verifiably.

In the FHAL case we're talking about approximately a $100 million rise in market cap of publicly held stock with, in my opinion, no underlying assets and no history of success.

"The funds for the purchase by RFX of (i) 34,320,124 shares of
SPEA's Common Stock at an aggregate price of $3,432,012.40; (ii) 2,240,397
shares of SPEA's Common Stock at an aggregate price of $224,039.70; (iii)
8,689,599 shares of SPEA's Common Stock underlying warrants to purchase common
stock at a price of $1.00 per share (or an aggregate price of $8,689,599); (iv)
8,689,599 shares of SPEA's Common Stock underlying warrants to purchase common
stock at a price of $1.50 per share (or an aggregate price of $13,034,398.50);
and (v) 8,689,599 shares of SPEA's Common Stock underlying warrants to purchase
common stock at a price of $2.00 per share (or an aggregate price of
$17,379,198), will be obtained by RFX from a capital contribution provided by
Sillerman, its managing member, and its other members."


lesnshawn

08/04/06 11:18 PM

#30444 RE: gaonmymind #30417

The thing is, EVERY REVERSE MERGER just like EVER IPO is independent of what has happened in the past w/ other companies!!!

Don't people realize that!?

Oh, of course they do, but they just want you to think otherwise.

This is potentially a $4BB COMPANY!!!! THAT deserves valuation that reflects such.

Of course, time will tell and that 10K will be QUITE the read.

Patience folks...but telling a badger that is like telling a howling infant to stop crying.

Have a great night, folks!

lns

xlr8rs

08/04/06 11:54 PM

#30461 RE: gaonmymind #30417

Gaonmymind: You must be on the wrong board. No reverse merger is taking place with this stock.

Modern_Rock

08/05/06 10:06 PM

#30757 RE: gaonmymind #30417

a REVERSE SPLIT is NOT a Reverse Merger! haha you guys are funny

gaonmymind

08/05/06 10:19 PM

#30760 RE: gaonmymind #30417

WTF? Who said anything about a reverse split...WOW, you are desperate dude, time to go chase some women....SEE YA!

Our-Street

08/10/06 3:06 AM

#36007 RE: gaonmymind #30417

Interesting... but these examples are all of shells that had not already traded on the hype of the merger. If you check the charts you will see that FHAL WAS such a shell.. and was trading at a few pennies before all the merger hype. Now the stock has the merger already figured into the price and is inflated beyond that based upon the illegal representations made by Rufus Harris that the stock would be reset to $15. So, on one hand.. you are correct in that reverse mergers into shell corps usually result in significant jumps in price, on the other everyone is mistakenly thinking that the post merger market adjustment is a future event when, in fact, it is a part of this stock's history. All that remains is for the stock to once again readjust itself as people figure out that Rufus was not being honest in his representations about his ability to control the market price of the stock as it relates to your ability to trade on it.