InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,303.27
(
0.12%
)
US TECH 100
18,062.00
(
-0.10%
)
Dow Jones
40,003.59
(
0.34%
)
Brent Oil
83.76
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
66,797.56
(
-0.21%
)

Replies to post #28608 on Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD)

Replies to #28608 on Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD)

dougSF30

03/12/04 10:13 AM

#28609 RE: KeithDust2000 #28608

Why would Intel still be screwing around with their 130nm process? What does that say about their 90nm process?

Doug

BUGGI1000

03/12/04 10:21 AM

#28611 RE: KeithDust2000 #28608

@Keith

Just a add:

http://developer.intel.com/design/pcn/Processors/D0103926.pdf
http://developer.intel.com/design/pcn/Processors/D0103930.pdf

BUGGI

j3pflynn

03/12/04 10:31 AM

#28612 RE: KeithDust2000 #28608

Keith - re: additional layers.
Seems like someone else did that once in the past? ;)

sgolds

03/12/04 10:39 AM

#28614 RE: KeithDust2000 #28608

That should affect their yield, production time and cost... eom.

jhalada

03/12/04 10:46 AM

#28615 RE: KeithDust2000 #28608

Keith,

INTEL to add 2 metal layers to 130nm process

INTEL goes from 6 to 8 for Xeon with 1 and 2 MB cache, and for Extreme Edition chips. Starting in April.

LOL. I posted on the subject recently:
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?msgid=19902154&s=layer

But this sounds even worse. It looks like Intel thinks they will need 130nm for a while...

Joe