InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 251732
Next 10

fid

Followers 2
Posts 126
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/06/2005

fid

Re: drbio45 post# 37849

Saturday, 02/03/2007 2:10:20 PM

Saturday, February 03, 2007 2:10:20 PM

Post# of 251732
Since you follow the space and are aware of the alxn results you also know that the peak ck-mb of 100ng/ml is the most appropriate endpoint and medicure's data shows that it reduces the risk of MI and death when that marker is used.

The phase 2 only had 900 patients and they thought by lowering the endpoint to 50ng/ml they would see more events but it created noise.

but then again I am sure you knew that


1. Was there not more mortality/stroke in the two treatment groups compared to placebo? Cause for concern in a trial to reduce mortality? Thoughts?

2. Any thoughts on the following?

Most studies have found a good correlation between the degree of CK-MB elevation and mortality risk, with higher risk for patients with CK-MB >5 times above the upper normal limit Keep in mind 100ng/ml=20 times upper normal limit

http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/110/6/674?ijkey=ea5469d653d282c26323218cdc99c396cb3b36b....


Two studies to put 100ng/ml in perspective.

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1560125

http://meeting.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/abstract/128/4/266S-c


fid






Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.